Anybody can say "THAT IS JUST WRONG". Recognizing WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY and HOW is what separates the Referee from the wannabes.
When analyzing the videos fill in the blanks:
- What...
- When...
- Where...
- Why...
- How...
Concentration/ Awareness:
- Is the referee aware of a possible conflict in allowing the game to continue?
- Is there immediate communication between the match officials to avoid unnecessary protests or appeals?
- Does the referee keep his focus and concentration throughout the incident?
- Is the referee in a good position to make the correct decision?
- Is the communication process appropriate in deciding who the offending player is?
- Is the referee aware of what the law allows in certain situations?
- Is the AR closer to the action than the referee?
- Does the AR have a better view of the incident than the referee?
- Does the referee have a better view of the incident than the AR?
- Is the signal from the AR to the referee clear?
- Did the referee make a decision before the signal by the AR?
- Does the incident happen out of the view of the referee?
- Does the AR inform the referee about any misconduct?
- Should one of the match officials have seen the incident?
- Should the fourth official intervene if none of the other officials saw the incident?
- Has teamwork broken down because of a lack of concentration?
- Is the referee too close to the incident?
- Is the referee too far away to make a credible decision?
- Is the referees view obscured by a player(s)?
- Does the referee create a good viewing angle in order to get the correct decision?
- Is the Assistant Referee better placed than the referee?
- Are both the referee and the assistant referee in good viewing positions?
Video #1
Video #2
Video #4
Video #5
No comments:
Post a Comment