8/18/2014

F.I.R.E.

The F-I-R-E Principle for Dealing with Above-the-Shoulder Challenges

Actions aimed at the face of an opponent must be dealt with severely REGARDLESS OF THE FORCE USED if the actions are:
  • Deliberate
  • Intended to intimidate
  • Endangering the safety of an opponent
  • Insulting and/or offensive in nature
  • Potentially inciting further action on the part of opponents
The following lists some specific examples (but not all examples) of the manner in which the contact can be initiated are:
  • Use of the backhand
  • Open handed slap
  • A push/slap to the face
  • The jabbing of a finger(s) to the face
  • Grabbing hair
  • Use of a fist
To assist referees in recognizing and properly addressing these situations, the acronym F-I-R-E was provided to assist officials with the identification of elbows that should be defined as red card offenses (violent conduct):
  • Frustration
  • Intimidation
  • Retaliation (payback)
  • Establish Territory or Space
When applying the aforementioned examples, the use of force becomes increasingly important as it relates to contact with the back of the player’s head as the likelihood for injury is somewhat lessened as compared to contact with the face.  Consequently, some discretion may be exercised on the part of the referee as it relates to contact with the back of the head depending upon the intent and the force used.

Video Clip: New England at Real Salt Lake (19:53) 
This clip involves violent conduct as a result of a player striking an opponent by head butting him. The player uses his head (hard surface) to contact the opponent in a very vulnerable area (the soft surface of the face). In addition, the act falls under the guidelines provided above and in the “Contact Above the Shoulder” directive. The player’s actions are: deliberate, intended to intimidate, endanger the safety of the opponent, incite further action on the part of opponents and are executed in a provocative and inciteful manner. As a result, the player must be sent off for violent conduct.
Referees can attempt to take preventative actions when similar situations arise. Although the referee attempts to provide flow to the game by allowing play to continue as the goalkeeper gains clear possession of the ball (despite a bridging/tripping foul being committed by the attacker as the keeper goes up in the air to gather the ball), the referee must be cognizant of the actions that follow and their potential impact on the game. In this case, a quick whistle on the part of the referee to stop play as soon as the players go chest-to-chest would potentially prevent further action. Given the attacker’s immediate actions, the referee could stop the game and eventually restart with a free kick for the defense. The free kick could result from the tripping/bridging foul as advantage did not materialize or for unsporting behavior for bringing the game into disrepute (review the “Game Disrepute and Mass Confrontation” directive. This would require the referee to caution the attacker for unsporting behavior and restart with an indirect free kick. By taking either of these actions, the referee is using common sense and is using preventative techniques to manage/control the game.
Once the referee has stopped the game, he should immediately sprint to the area of the confrontation. The referee’s presence could act as a tool to prevent escalation of the situation. Upon quick arrival, the referee could separate or channel the players thereby defusing the situation.
Pursuant to U.S. Soccer directives and guidance, the attacker in this clip should be red carded for violent conduct.

8/14/2014

Make The Call -


What should the Referee do if he notices a goalkeeper, standing inside his own penalty area, smoking a cigarette while the ball is in play and possessed by one of his teammates who is about to take a shot to the opponents' goal?

 (ATR 12.28.1, 12.25)

Referees: Showing Urgency at the Right Time

Feeling the game comes in many forms whether it be identifying persistent infringement or sensing trouble spots or trouble situations in a match. The ability to anticipate these “flash points” or warning signs is vital to preventative officiating. For example, feeling a situation or “flash point” can lead to a referee modifying his position or to initiating communication with a player(s) all in the hopes of prevention.

A referee’s presence is often a key component of urgency. The speed and energy a referee uses to get to a spot or to be around the ball or play can play a vital role in helping to channel player behavior in a positive, preventative manner. Players can feel or sense a referee’s presence and this can influence their decision-making process.


VIDEOAlmost two minutes into added time, a throw-in is being taken by the team winning 1-0. The throw-in is deep into their attacking half. The thrower plays the ball toward the corner flag. This is a warning sign or potential “flash point” for the referee. The referee senses that the attacking team will work to hold the ball near the corner flag in an attempt to waste time, get a corner kick, get another throw in or be the benefactor of a foul.
As the clip unfolds and the throw in is played toward the corner, the referee can be observed increasing his work rate. He is not standing and watching. He is moving with the ball feeling a potential “flash point.” This anticipation allows him to be close when calling a foul and then the referee exhibits even more urgency as he recognizes a second “flash point:” Two players on the ground and attempting to get up. click here for the VIDEO

8/06/2014

Simulation

Simulation, diving, embellishment, gamesmanship, play acting.  Whatever term is used, the action should be addressed by the referee.  Players who employ this tactic not only ruin the enjoyment of the spectators but are attempting to cheat the game and influence a potentially game-deciding ruling from the referee.  Furthermore, simulation also often raises the frustration level of opponents resulting in face-to-face confrontations.
Remember, the ultimate goal of players is to get the referee to unfairly punish the opponent.  As a consequence, simulation is a prime candidate for cheating.   As a potential act of simulation confronts the referee, the official must quickly consider the following guidelines:
  • Human Act vs. Intentional Act
    • Human Act - Does the situation involve incidental contact?
    • Intentional Act - Is there deception involved?  No contact or contact intentionally created by the attacker.  Referees must train their eyes, mind, and responses.  When evaluating a player’s action to determine if it meets the criteria of simulation, consider the following signals:
  • Location on the field - Often times, players dive in or near the penalty area.  The player is willing to take a chance that his cheating will go unnoticed by the officials and result in a penalty kick or dangerous free kick.
  • Contact - It is difficult to caution a player for simulation (unsporting behavior) when there is contact with the opponent. Hence, contact and who initiates it, must be taken into consideration.  Do not mistake simulation for embellishment.  Embellishment occurs when a player “play acts.”  In other words, the player makes a minor infraction seem much grander in scale.  Embellishment, is cautionable for unsporting behavior.
  • Score of the game - A team that is needing a goal to tie the game or to gain a lead, will attempt to garner a penalty or free kick in the “danger zone” (30 yards or so from goal).
  • The ball - Can the attacker get or play the ball?  Attackers with the ball who have touched it too far in front of them will go down easily as a defender challenges them because they know they will not be able to get to the ball (it will go over the goal line or an opponent will get it) and they will lose possession.
  • The attacker’s feet - As the player is going down, observe his feet.  Does the player bring his feet together and drag them along the ground causing him to intentionally lose his balance and go to the turf?
  • The attacker’s actions before he lands and when he lands - First, evaluate the attacker’s eyes and head.  As divers go down, they are likely to try to make eye contact with the referee.  It is a natural reaction for players to look for the decision maker (the referee) and to see where he is positioned.  Second, evaluate the attacker’s arms – bracing the fall.  Attackers who go down as a result of an unfair challenge, often times do not have the opportunity to brace their fall.  Players who plan their fall, will look to cushion their fall by extending their arms out or by rolling on their shoulder.
Remember, players who utilize diving/simulation are cautioned for unsporting behavior.

8/01/2014

Advanced Referee Clinic 8/11/2014

WSRO Advanced Referee Clinic
Topic : "Doubtful vs Trifling"

Monday, 8/11/14 at 7:00PM
Discussion Group 6:00pm-7:00pm

I Will Grinton Library
Sen. Flynn Community Room
1500 Central Park Avenue
Yonkers, NY 10710

Please confirm your attendance as soon as possible
since the room only holds about 35 people.

If you have any questions feel free to contact me